{"id":2691,"date":"2017-11-13T08:50:17","date_gmt":"2017-11-13T13:50:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.graymanwrites.com\/blog\/?p=2691"},"modified":"2017-11-13T08:52:38","modified_gmt":"2017-11-13T13:52:38","slug":"ive-only-been-saying-this-for-a-freaking-quarter-century","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/ive-only-been-saying-this-for-a-freaking-quarter-century\/","title":{"rendered":"I’ve Only Been Saying This for a Freaking Quarter CENTURY"},"content":{"rendered":"

What’s this? Labeling certain students as “gifted” might have a downside<\/a>?<\/p>\n

Through personal conversations with her students, [Stanford education professor Jo] Boaler began to see how being labeled \u201cgifted\u201d or \u201csmart\u201d as children stunted even these bright and successful young people….<\/p>\n

It\u2019s hard to feel sorry for Stanford students, many of whom have had amazing opportunities not offered to peers precisely because someone recognized them as smart, but their experiences do call into question the practice of labeling in the first place.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Wow, if only someone had pointed out potential problems<\/strong> with sequestering certain students and labeling them as “gifted” — oh, wait, I did that,<\/strong> in the first edition of Quality Education<\/a><\/em>. Granted, I put the topic in an appendix entitled “The Gifted and Talented Myth,” which in retrospect wasn’t the best place to highlight it, but it was<\/em> there.<\/p>\n

In the new edition, the subject of “gifted and talented” programs takes a more prominent position in four short chapters instead of one lengthy appendix.<\/p>\n

Gifted and talented education usually is not limited to letting students with special aptitudes learn at a faster rate. These programs often remove some few students from their original classrooms, place them together with other \u201cgifted\u201d students, and focus more attention on their efforts. The students are told explicitly that they are part of the \u201cgifted and talented\u201d program, and become increasingly aware of differences between themselves and other students. But at what level does a student simply have a better grasp of a subject as opposed to being \u201cgifted\u201d? The differentiation is not always clear.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There’s more, of course, but that’s enough to prove today’s point.<\/p>\n

I admit, it’s gratifying to find someone agreeing with something I said a quarter century ago. But it’s also incredibly frustrating, and rather makes me feel like:<\/p>\n

\"Picard<\/p>\n

What a way to start the week.<\/p>\n

___
\nP.S. If you want a FREE copy of the introduction to Quality Education<\/em>, you can get one by signing up for my newsletter<\/a> (you get two other free gifts, too). I’d also be pleased if you would pick up a copy from Amazon<\/a>.<\/p>\n\"Facebook\"<\/a>\"twitter\"<\/a>\"pinterest\"<\/a>\"linkedin\"<\/a>\"mail\"<\/a>by <\/span>\"feather\"<\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What’s this? Labeling certain students as “gifted” might have a downside? Through personal conversations with her students, [Stanford education professor Jo] Boaler began to see how being labeled \u201cgifted\u201d or \u201csmart\u201d as children stunted even these bright and successful young people…. It\u2019s hard to feel sorry for Stanford students, many \u2026 Continue reading → <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[66,449],"class_list":["post-2691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-musings","tag-education","tag-teaching"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2691"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2691\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2694,"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2691\/revisions\/2694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grayrinehart.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}